Bad Marie by Marcy Dermansky

Marie is bad. The interesting question is what makes her bad. She is recently released from prison. She was incarcerated for incredibly bad judgment. She fell for a criminal who fancied himself Clyde. Her version is revealing of what makes her both charming and bad:

My boyfriend robbed a bank. A small one. In the suburbs. Juan Jose. He was only twenty-two years old. He was this perfect boy. Like a painting. I wasn’t much older, twenty-four. I didn’t know he was going to rob a bank. I knew almost nothing about him, really. I had met him in a bar, the week before. He showed up in the middle of the night at my door. Scared. Bleeding. I didn’t even think about it. He needed me. We went to Mexico. Later, after the police found us, I went to jail. I didn’t regret it. I don’t.

The other thing that makes Marie charming is her love for Cailtin, the girl she nannies as her first job out of prison. Caitlin is the daughter of Ellen, Marie’s childhood acquaintance. Ellen is from a privileged background, Marie is not. Ellen’s mother felt sorry for Marie, so she took every opportunity to invite Marie over to the house and to foster a friendship between Ellen and Marie. The girls are not, it turns out, a good match. Ellen has her mother’s sense of nobless oblige, however, so Ellen gives Marie her first post-prison position.

As the quote above demonstrates, Marie often does not carefully deliberate over a decision and its consequences before acting. To counterbalance this impetuousness, she rarely feels remorse. (“Marie did not believe in regret.”) The quality is one of her more endearing traits.

Ellen should have known better. In high school, Marie slept with Ellen’s boyfriend. The criminal escapade, while not indicative of maliciousness, should make a person pause to place their child’s well-being in the hands of Marie. Marie is aware of all this and, thus, feels no guilt in giving Ellen her comeuppance when things predictably turn sour between them.

The movie-critic author describes Bad Marie as her attempt to write a French movie. I think that is probably as accurate a description of the feel of the novel as any. The book could easily be converted into a movie. Imagery is extremely important to the novel and its success. The thread of the story is populated by a number of elegant visual pearls. Despite the absence of lovable characters (excepting Caitlin), despite Marie being bad, she matters. Her decisions, as poor as they are, have import.

This novel is not unlike Brooklyn in that the central character is frustrating. Marie is a bit more actively bad than Toibin’s Eilis, but neither make good decisions. Marie is almost the antithesis of Eilis. Where Eilis is passive, Marie is active. Where Eilis allows others to manipulate her, Marie more often manipulates those around her. At least, she acts. She fills with her presence the novel, her surroundings, New York, Paris.

The meat of the novel is the character study of Marie. Dermansky seems to get her right. Her decisions, destined to break hearts and ruin lives in surprising ways, flow naturally from her attributes and flaws. Marie is a liberating alter ego for those who want to fly to foreign lands on a moment’s notice. There is a freshness to entering the mind of someone with so little regard for consequences, so little self-awareness, so much engagement with the moment. And, yet, everything about her feels tragic. A person cannot successfully live as Marie lives.

Because she cannot seem to learn from the past or project into the future, Marie is able to deny that a disastrous decision can only lead to bad things. It is this, rather than a malicious nature, that makes Marie bad. She assumes that life is more chaotic than it actually is, that the near future is as unpredictable as next year’s weather. Societal rules are made for the Maries of the world. They need rules and they need to follow them, because they are so incredibly bad at making decisions on their own. Marie’s simple spontaneity is a poor way to live, but a fine way to carry a novel.

Bad Marie has to be a long shot to win the Tournament of Books, but the odds are good it will please its readers. I would not be surprised to see it upset one of the books with more reputation and less verve.

6 Responses to Bad Marie by Marcy Dermansky

  1. That sounds very good, and I like the quote. The comparison with Brooklyn (which I just finished and hopefully can write up tomorrow) is fascinating.

    Do you know the author otherwise?

    • Kerry says:

      To be clear, the quote above is dialogue. Marie is explaining to someone else the circumstances leading to her imprisonment. But, still, I liked it and I thought it gave as good an insight into Marie as possible without regurgitating the plot (which did not seem the correct approach for this book).

      I will be looking forward to your write-up of Brooklyn. I really enjoyed that book. I am happy there was a little serendipity here. Marie does seem to be, in some ways, the anti-Eilis. Neither approach to life is apt to produce good results.

      I do not know Marcy Dermansky otherwise. I only read an interview included at the back of the book and the “About the Author” blurb. I believe she has only one other book out. On the strength of this one, it goes on the TBR longlist.

      And, I don’t want to oversell the book. Dermansky is not quite as polished as Colm Toibin, but definitely worth a try if my short description piqued your interest. Of course, the good news is you’ll get at least one more perspective in the ToB come March…

  2. Michelle says:

    This looks rather interesting…I sometimes like the challenge of a novel that asks its reader to follow a main character we might not approve of.

    • Kerry says:

      It is interesting. I also like novels that challenge the reader. I hate novels where it is easy to decide who to love and who to hate. They are maddeningly unrealistic.

  3. Biblibio says:

    I was about to comment now on how I actually don’t really like the quote, and then I saw that it’s part of a dialogue (which makes a lot more sense…). Bad Marie seems interesting and readers seem to like it, but I don’t know how much it appeals to me. I don’t really like that idea of a French movie, after all. On the other hand… this is very different (both in style and approach) from the majority of books I read. Seems like it might just be good for me to step out of my comfort zone and take a swing…

    • Kerry says:

      Here is a different (also early) explanation of her “friendship” with Ellen and the events leading to prison, but not in dialogue:

      [Ellen] assumed that they viewed life the same way because they came from the same town and had gone to a Bruce Springsteen concert together when they were thirteen. She didn’t understand that taunting Marie about prison was useless, because Marie was not embarrassed. Or ashamed. Marie had never felt any regret.

      She had been in love. Wildly, madly, thoughtlessly, heedlessly in love. When Juan Jose had shown up at her door, desperate, covered in blood, when he had told her that he had made it out of the bank, but his partner hadn’t been so lucky, that the police were searching for him, she’d run off without a moment’s hesitation and she had never looked back.

      In all, the plot is interesting, the characterization is spot-on, and the handling of a bad character is excellent. I think it will be hard not to like this one, if you do choose to try it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: